Chapter 6 — Law v Legal

As we mentioned briefly in the Constitution chapter, our Governments have underhandedly brought private law into effect within the Commonwealth of Australia through UNIDROIT.  Most people around the world have never even heard of UNIDROIT, let alone understand the far-reaching ramifications of it.

So, what is UNIDROIT?

It is the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (Institut International pour L’Unification du Droit Prive).

63 States are members of UNIDROIT. There are 25 representatives sitting on the Governing council, the President of which is Prof. Alberto MAZZONI (Italy).  Australia joined on 20^th of March 1973 through the Attorney General’s Department - the Attorney-General is the one who drafts all our legislation.  Australia is on the Governing council: the representative’s name is Roger Wilkins.

UNIDROIT is an independent intergovernmental organisation with its seat in the Villa Aldobrandini in Rome.  It was originally connected to the League of Nations, but after the collapse of the League, the Institute was re-established in 1940.  Its purpose is to study needs and methods of modernising, harmonising and co-ordinating private and, in particular, commercial law as between States and groups of States, and to formulate uniform law instruments, principles and rules to achieve those objectives.

UNIDROIT covers many different areas, including:

• Contracts.
• Negotiable instruments.
• Banking Law.
• Secured Transactions.
• Franchising.
• Insurance.
• Civil Procedure.
• Civil Liability.
• Leasing.
• Hotels.
• Municipal Law.
• Marriage.
• Transport
• Legal Status of Women.
• Maintenance Obligations.
• Space.
• Transportation

UNIDROIT is the organisation that the Pope and the Holy See - who is is the "foreign power" referred to in the Bill of Rights - uses to bring private law into being in all countries. UNIDROIT is binding on the "hand that writes the law" - in Australia that is the Attorney-General - without seeking consent from The People via a referendum.

The Attorney-General and the government of the day did this completely contrary to the Bill of Rights 1688-9 which, as we referred to in the Fines and Constitution chapters, applies here in Australia as an entrenched law.  The Bill of Rights was drafted by Prince William and Princess Mary of Orange, to deliver the Kingdom away from papery  (Pope and his Princes) and arbitrary power, also known as Roman law, being exercised through the Holy See as described in Section 13 and the 13 sub-sections.

Section 13 (8) - “And for preventing all questions and divisions in this realm, by reason of any pretended titles to the crown …” This subsection makes invalid the alleged “Queen of Australia”, and places all those in the role of Governor-General or State Governor into a position of impersonating a Commonwealth Public Officer, pursuant to Division 148.1 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code Act 1995, the penalty for which includes imprisonment.

 Section 13 (9) - “And, whereas it hath been found by experience that it is inconsistent with the safety and welfare of this Protestant Kingdom to be governed by a Popish Prince, or by any King or Queen marrying a papist …That all and every person and persons that is, are or shall be reconciled to, or shall hold communion with, the see or church of Rome, or shall profess the popish religion, or shall marry a papist, shall be excluded, and be forever incapable to inherit, possess or enjoy the crown and government of this realm, and Ireland, and the dominions thereto belonging, or any part of the same, or to have, use or exercise any regal power or authority, or jurisdiction within the same,………”

This is the “allegiance to a foreign power” issue that we referred to in the Constitution Chapter.

The Imperial Acts Application Act 1980 (Vic) comes in under section 8 - Habeas Corpus - which was re-confirmed as law as recently as 2010 in the High Court case – Port or Portland v State of Victoria, which we include in our References section/CD.

One of the key protections that We, The People are afforded by the Bill of Rights is:

Section 12 - “That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction, are illegal and void.” (emphasis added)

A ‘particular person’ is defined as a ‘Protestant’ and a ‘subject’ and they are bound to obey public law, also referred to as the Law of the Land, which has followed proper due process without any arbitrary influence. This is why the Citizenship Act was brought in, in 1948, to make us ‘citizens’ as opposed to ‘subjects’ and, thus, try and remove our rights under the Bill of Rights.

It is important to remember “the supreme, absolute and uncontrollable authority that remains with the people” (Emphasis added).  Quick and Garron Annotation of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution (page 286)

As you can see, UNIDROIT is an insidious organization that infiltrates every aspect of our lives. You can find out more about UNIDROIT by clicking this link.

The Lieber Code is the code used by UNIDROIT that governs all operators of private law which were brought in by this foreign power. The Leiber code is, essentially, the rules that govern our government and how they, in turn, govern us.

The Lieber Code of 1863 was prepared by Francis Lieber, LL.D.  (Doctor of Law) and was revised by a board of Officers, and approved by the President of the United States.

Article 1:  Martial Law – Military Jurisdiction - Military Necessity – Retaliation

“A Place, District, or country occupied by an enemy stands, in consequence of the occupation, under the Martial law of the invading or occupying army, whether any proclamation declaring Martial law, or any public warning to the inhabitants, has been issued or not.  Martial law is the immediate and direct effect and consequence of occupation or conquest.”

This is how the government justifies their takeover in secret.

Article 32: Public and private property of the enemy -- Protection of persons, and especially of women, of religion, the arts and sciences -- Punishment of crimes against the inhabitants of hostile countries

“A victorious army, by the martial power inherent in the same, may suspend, change, or abolish, as far as the martial law extends, the relations which arise from the services due, according to the existing laws of the invaded country, from one citizen, subject, or native of the same to another.  The commander of the army must leave it to the ultimate treaty of peace to settle the permanency of this change.”

The concern with all of this is that our government is implementing these clearly unconstitutional measures, under the false and misleading guise of ‘peace’ when, in fact, it can all be traced back to the Pope, who is acting in an ‘occult’ manner.

Ballantine's Law Dictionary, 3rd edition defines ‘occult’ as, "Concealed, hidden, secret, beyond the understanding of man."

The Attorney-General created the Royal Styles and Titles Act 1973 in order to create the executive, which gives Royal Assent to whatever legislation the Attorney-General drafts from that point on.

The Royal Styles and Titles Act 1973 created the ‘Queen of Australia’ without a Referendum, as the Queen is mentioned 40 times through the Commonwealth Constitution, and without the swearing-in ceremony where the Queen takes the Coronation Oath obliging that entity to uphold the scriptures as laid out in the King James Version of the Bible.  Accordingly, the purported ‘Queen of Australia’ has no lawful authority whatsoever.

As we explained in the Constitution chapter, only The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia has the legislative power to draft legislation so, UNIDROIT used the Attorney-General to create a new Parliament - being the purported "Parliament of Australia", in order to give authority to draft legislation in line with their private law.

A final important point to note is that the ‘powers-that-be’ can only force their private laws upon us if they have ‘policy enforcers’ – police, sheriff’s officers, etc. to do their dirty work for them. If those groups stopped enforcing those unlawful, private laws then the entire system would collapse.

So, there are two things that we can do to ensure that happens: firstly, you can help us spread the word so that these policy enforcers start to understand this vital concept of private law v common law.

And then, if you really want to challenge them, ask them to watch the extremely powerful and confronting “Message to Police” video which is also available on our References CD.

Go Back to Chapter 5 or move onto Chapter 7.